fbpx

The Latest Neuromarketing Insights

Emoticons in Customer Service: Why They Can Backfire And How To Use Them Right

Relevant topics Research, Archive

  • Written by:
    Friederike Niehoff
  • Neuromarketing Principle:
    Depending on the context, the use of emoticons can lead customers to perceive the service employee as warmer but less competent compared to one who does not use emoticons.
  • Application:
    Discover in which context the use of emoticons in customer service can benefit your customer experience.
  • Emoticons and emoji’s seem to be everywhere these days: In text messages from friends, in social media campaigns from major brands and even in e-mails from customer service representatives.

    And that makes sense, right? They present an opportunity for companies to connect with their customers in a relatable and creative approach. Besides, according to a global survey conducted by Genesis; 40% of customers claim that the biggest improvement in customer service can be achieved through investing in a “better human service”. So why not use emoticons in customer service interactions in order to make them more human? 

     

    Mixed Emotions About Emoticons

    The Google search query for; “emoticons in marketing” has more than 7 million hits and you will find countless blogs and articles advising you on which emoticons to use for higher customer satisfaction, increased engagement and more sales. Unfortunately, most scientific research insights on the use of emoticons in customer service and marketing are inconsistent and contradictory.

    To start you off with the first set of conflicting insights; A recent study at Penn University, showed that the use of emoji’s could increase customer satisfaction by 78% compared to using plain text. But a survey by YouGov found that 59% of people aged between 18 and 34 say that they perceive companies as “trying too hard” when using emoji’s in marketing campaigns.

    So, what to do? Where to start? Do you even know the difference between emoji and emoticons? I certainly did not, a quick google search revealed the truth upon this mystery. Emoticons are old-school typed out in punctuation marks, whereas emoji’s are their updated counterpart: Icons, which can be anything from a smiley face to a pile of poo. It’s potato, potahto and tomato, tomahto: We are talking emotions, no matter whether they are typed like this :-) or displayed like this 😊.

    Some Context and Facts

    • The first use of an emoticon came from American computer scientist Scott E. Fahlman in 1982. He suggested that :-) could indicate humorous posts on a message board and :-( could indicate serious posts.
    • 92% of all internet users use emoji’s and 30% use them several times a day.
    • On Facebook Messenger alone, over 900 million emoji’s are sent every day without text.
    • 2,823 emoji’s were on the Unicode Standard list in 2018, with new ones being introduced every year.
    • The emoji with the official title “face with tears of joy” is the most commonly used emoji on Twitter.

     Competence Versus Warmth

    New research by Li, Chan, and Kim (2018) aimed to resolve those previously mentioned mixed findings. They hypothesized that emoticon users are often evaluated on two different dimensions: competence and warmth. Through laboratory and field experiments, they found that customers rate service employees who make use of emotions as more warm and pleasant but simultaneously perceive them as less competent than those who use plain text only.

    Next, the researchers also managed to demonstrate that the direction of the emoticon effect depends on the type of relationship norm that is salient in the customers’ minds. If the customer has a primary communal relationship norm, so focusing on the relationship, the usage of emoticons can have positive effects on customer satisfaction, as those customers value warmth. If the customer has a primary exchange relationship norm, focusing more on a transaction rather than the relationship, competence is more important and sending emoticons can decrease customer satisfaction.

    Finally, Li, Chan, and Kim also proved that this effect is valid in two practically important service situations that can make a certain type of relationship norm more salient: negative unsatisfactory services and positive additional services provided by the service employee. In the negative circumstances, emoticons made the situation even worse and decreased customer satisfaction, because it triggered primarily exchange norms and made customers focus on competence instead of warmth. In the positive circumstances, emoticons had a positive effect on customer satisfaction, because communal norms were more salient and lead customers to focus more on warmth than competence.

    Interesting fact: All findings were robust across different media platforms like email, Facebook and instant messenger.

    Real Life Tops and Flops

    Domino’s Pizza may provide us with insights into the biggest success story when it comes to applying emoji’s in marketing communication. Domino’s does a great job inducing a more communal environment on social media, in order so that their customers interpret the emoticons in terms of higher warmth rather than lower competence. After the introduction of ‘emoji ordering’, dominoes changed the game of pizza delivery services completely. ‘Emoji ordering’ allows customers to order a pizza through tweeting or texting a pizza emoji to Domino’s. Resulting in a nice fresh pizza delivered to your doorstep in under 30 minutes.

     

    Another great example of using emoticons in pop culture is that of Hilary Clinton. Back in 2016 during her presidential campaign, Hilary introduced the Hillarymoji app containing over 30 emoticons, stickers, and GIFs, which could be used in conversations on WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger. The brand Hillary Clinton benefited from the engagement and exposure, but keeping recent research insights in mind, one might wonder whether triggering the dimension warmth instead of competence was a smart move for Hillary.

     

    When you think of investment banking, you don’t usually associate it with warmth and communal norms, but rather of competence and transactional business. Therefore it shouldn’t be a surprise that Goldman Sachs mainly got negative attention as a reaction to this tweet in 2015:

    Take-Home Points:

    • It is crucial to really understand your customer needs and take relationship norms into account when deciding to use emoticons in customer service.
    • To maximize the benefit of emoticons in customer service use them mainly once a personal business relationship has been established, so that customers interpret the emoticons in terms of higher warmth rather than lower competence.
    • Avoid the use of emoticons after a negative service experience.
    • Use emoticons to accompany additional services to enhance customers’ service experiences.
    • Conduct A/B testing in order to gain more insight into your customers depending on their context and situation. 
  • Emoticons in Customer Service: Why They Can Backfire And How To Use Them Right
  • Reference:

    Li, X., Chan, K. W., & Kim, S. (2018). Service with emoticons: How customers interpret employee use of emoticons in online service encounters. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 973-987

  •  

    Further Reading

    • When to Follow Customer Expectations – And when to Break Them

      When to Follow Customer Expectations – And when to Break Them

      Each and every day, package designers, retail planners and online UX experts all face the same question: should you follow customer expectations, or should you break them?

      Many experts propose that stores, products and websites should strictly adhere to what the customer expects. This would increase the fluency of the customer experience, leading to increased feelings of positive emotion and – ultimately – purchase behavior.

      Nonetheless, there are countless examples of successful concepts that had their rule-breaking philosophy to thank for. From Dell cutting out the middle man in an industry where no one believed people would buy any place else than the retail store, to Craigslist proving discarding many emblematic UX and design rules.

       

    NewNeuroLOGO 500x500 wit NEG

    New insights every month