fbpx

The Latest Neuromarketing Insights

Are Chatbots Catching Up To Human Salesmen?

Relevant topics Research, Archive

  • Written by:
    Nikki Leeuwis
  • Neuromarketing Principle:
    A machine is considered less empathic and also less knowledgeable compared to humans.
  • Application:
    Do not to reveal the identity of a chatbot at the beginning of a sales conversation. Instead, use disclosure after the decision is made. This works almost as well as proficient workers.
  • Most likely, you'll recognize that vague feeling when talking to a customer support chat service, that the "person" you're chatting with might actually be a computer. 

    Indeed, the market size of chatbots is expanding: starting at $250 million in 2017, it will be more than $1.34 billion in 2024 (Pise, 2018). A chatbot is an automated speech generator that can respond to both written and auditory text. More than 21% of US adults and even more than 80% of generation Z (born between 1996 and 2010) use voice/text bots for information search and shopping.

    chatbots are everywhere

    Almost every week, a new chatbot application is released. Only at the start of may Facebook launched a new chatbot that claims to be superior in demonstrating empathy, knowledge, and personality. It was trained on 1.5 billion human conversations to make it as human as possible. Facebook now claims 'Blender' to be better than Google's latest chatbot Meena, who was released last January.

    Other examples are plenty: two years ago, Google introduced Duplex, a system that can call hairdressers and restaurants to make a reservation for you. Domino's Pizza uses chatbots to take your orders. KLM created Blue Bot, which helps KLM travellers to find travel destinations, book flights, and pack their bags. It will even suggest you to bring an umbrella when the weather is terrible at your destination!

    Applying the functionality can fulfil your business goals. HelloFresh's Freddy, for example, is a Facebook messenger chatbot that helps customers to find a recipe and order the ingredients. This chatbot helped HelloFresh to reduce their Facebook response time by 76%!

    And not only for pure business: the World Health Organisation created a chatbot to reduce misinformation about the coronavirus. Automatic chatting is also used for mental health (Bendig, Erb, Schulze-Thuesing, & Baumeister, 2019) and for diabetes: the Lark bot engages users with a kind and humorous persona that monitors health data and utilizes that to stimulate healthy behaviours. Clearly chatbots are everywhere, but can they also be used by marketers to increase sales?

     

    Use chatbots for sales?

    Speech recognition and language processing of modern artificial intelligence (AI) technologies get more and more sophisticated. It enables the system to 'understand' complex, and subtle dialogs, and address consumer requests with depth, compassion, and even humour. 

    A recent study by Luo, Tong, Fang, and Qu set out to evaluate the customer experience with an AI-empowered chatbot at a major internet-based financial service company in Asia. 

    The chatbot was trained with the company's call centre voice data and passed the Turing-test successfully: 97% of its customers did not recognize speaking to a machine over the phone. The chatbot had a female voice with optimized pitch, tone, speed, and intonation. 

    The sales situation tested in this company was as follows: borrowers with a high credit score that had successfully repaid their loans in the past 11 months (of the 12 monthly instalments) were called to sell a loan renewal. In order to boost sales, the service agents informed the customer about a special promotional offer that was valid for 24-hour limited-time. 

     

    Comparing different sales agents

    Six different call agents were compared:

    1. The underdogs. These are the company's call centre agents whose past six-month call report performance is among the bottom 20th percentile.
    2. The proficient workers: the service agents whose performance is among the top 20% of all workers.
    3. AI without disclosure: the chatbot initiates the sales call and does not reveal its robot identity at all.
    4. AI disclosure before conversation: the chatbot reveals its identity at the very beginning of the conversation with the customer, before starting the sales.
    5. AI disclosure after conversation: at the very end of the call, the chatbot reveals being a machine.
    6. AI disclosure after decision: the chatbot reveals its identity after the customer has made his/her decision to renew the loan.

     

    Undercover computers are as good as experts

    The results from this study were twofold: 

    1. The purchase rate of a conversation with the chatbot that did not reveal its identity (situation 3), was as good as proficient call centre agents (situation 2). But disclosure of the chatbot before the conversation started (situation 4), led to terminated calls and the purchase rates were reduced by 79.7% (compared to no disclosure). Closer inspection of these results reveal that customers perceived the chatbot as less knowledgeable and empathetic. Most notably, consumers only experienced this when they knew it was a computer! 
    2. Unexpectedly, for customers that were experienced with AI (by the use of AI apps like ELSA SpeakCortanaFaceApp, etc.) purchase rate increased when the chatbot revealed its identity before the start of the conversation.So, you're perfectly fine to use a chatbot for sales conversations, but try not to reveal its identity at the beginning of the conversation to get the best results. Instead, use disclosure after the decision is made. This works almost as well as proficient workers. 


    The purchase rates for all conditions are summarised in the figure below. It shows that underdogs sell as bad as AI chatbots that are exposed before the conversation. Note, all call attempts are included in this number, while more than 56% hang up the phone after chatbot disclosure. Even so, after correcting for hang-up, the purchase rate was still low for exposed chatbots. On the contrary, when chatbots’ identity was not revealed, purchase rate was almost the same as proficient workers! The same holds for disclosure after the purchase decision was made. Most notably, disclosure at the end of the conversation, scored worse.

     

    Boundary conditions

    Call length seems to be an important factor in sales, as both underdogs and chatbot with disclosure before conversation had a smaller average length of call. It might be that using a chatbot without the customer knowing, might not be in harmony with your business value or customer trust. In that case, revealing that the sales call was done with a chatbot is best to do after the decision was made.

     

    Take home points

    • A human-AI assemblage strategy might work best: AI chatbots assisting workers (especially the underdogs) by analysing customer questions and emotional stress and then displaying the best answers from the company specific knowledge bank. 
    • Nevertheless, in absolute numbers your experienced employees are still the best salesmen!
    • A human-AI assemblage strategy might work best: AI chatbots assisting workers (especially the underdogs) by analysing customer questions and emotional stress and then displaying the best answers from the company specific knowledge bank. 

    • Nevertheless, in absolute numbers your experienced employees are still the best salesmen! 

  • Are Chatbots Catching Up To Human Salesmen?
  • Reference:

    Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., & Qu, Z. (2019). Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases. Marketing Science, 38(6), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1192

  •  
    NewNeuroLOGO 500x500 wit NEG

    New insights every month